December 10, 2013
Most, if not all, industry followers and observers have done a sharp reappraisal of the integrity of the
Gibraltar Gambling Commission in the wake of the near fiasco of
commissioner Phill Brear's response to the GTECH / BetFred rigged games issue. There's not much more I can add to what I've already said, so in addition to
taking the opportunity to state my own overall conclusion to the matter, I'm going to post links here to online material that has been dedicated to the
matter.
My opinion, which I would imagine is not going to surprise anyone who has followed my articles, is that the GGC is not a reputable regulator and should be disregarded as such by anyone planning to patronise operators located within their jurisdiction. In practical terms, what that means is that you should patronise casinos that you trust in themselves and not factor in the GGC when considering additional player security features. If you trust the casino, go ahead and play. If you're not sure, do not use the GGC stamp as sufficient reason to play.
Or, put in its starkest terms: disregard the GGC.
My own articles:
BetFred: rigged games
A closer look at the regulations
Proof they knew about the issue
The regulator's first and second responses
My analysis of the responses
Press coverage
The regulator's final response
Threat to Eliot Jacobson
Possible legally enforceable misconduct claims
Elsewhere:
Wizard Of Vegas:
Gaffed software at major Internet casinos
Casinomeister:
BetFred rigged games
Casinomeister:
Announcement from the GRA concerning Hilo and ReelDeal games
Beating Bonuses:
Betfred rigged allegations
GPWA:
Cheating at BetFred
Pittsburgh Tribune:
U.S. gaming regulators can learn from recent online case in Europe
Change.org:
Petition to get players compensated for losses on deceptive games.
0 Previous Comments
Post a Comment